A turning propeller is electrically insulated from the hull by the lubricating oil film in the bearings. Electrical potential is generated between the shaft and the hull and as a result the cathodic protection of the ship will not protect the propeller.
Electrical potential can cause currents in the bearings resulting in pitting of the bearing surfaces and I believe that many of you have heard about spark erosion and wonder what is it, how to discover and prevent it.
Spark erosion can occur if electrical potential in the crankshaft discharges through the main and thrust bearings, which if undiscovered can cause critical wear on the main bearings, and consequently severe crank train damage.
Nowadays the main bearings design is continuously improved through development of new lining material in order to improve lining fatigue strength. As an example for this reason, the white metal bearing lining thickness has been reduced from about 2.5 mm to 1.5 mm, but when lining thickness is reduced, the time from spark erosion onset until the situation becomes critical will also be reduced. Moreover, higher engine rating has led to a reduced minimum oil film thickness in the main bearings which can make an engine more sensitive to spark erosion.
In some cases of spark erosion have gotten out of hand because the main bearing wear was not noticed in time. The wear was found too late because the main bearing top clearance and crankshaft deflection measurements were compared to the maximum values in the manual instead of the reference values for the engine. As a recommendation a routine planned main bearing top clearance measurements and crankshaft deflection readings must be performed and the measured values must be stored for future reference. More frequent measurements will improve condition monitoring considerably.
Even when main bearings and thrust bearings are opened up for inspections, it can be hard to see signs of spark erosion. In this post I have put together a set of photos that show where to look and what to look for to help you find and recognize early signs of spark erosion and situations where spark erosion is a risk.

Upper main bearing shell with signs of spark erosion

The journal must be polished to meet surface roughness specifications
This is a journal, main bearings (AlSn40 Lining) and thrust collar with clear signs of spark erosion. Spark erosion signs are obvious, even in the upper main bearing shell. The bearing damage is irreparable, cannot be re-used and it has to be replaced.

The journal must be polished to meet surface roughness specifications

Corresponding main bearing lower shell with wide spread journal imprint. 0.5 mm of the shell is worn off between the two distinct, visible lines.
Above is a main bearing journal with signs of severe spark erosion.
The condition was not discovered in time, so this main bearing cannot be saved and is has to be replaced. The journal can still be used, but has to be polished to meet surface roughness specifications.

Main bearing journal

Corresponding lower bearing shell. Visible spark erosion, but no or limited wear can be measured
Above there is a main bearing with moderate spark erosion, discovered in time to save the bearing shell. This bearing can be re-used after dressing up. The journal must be polished to meet surface roughness specifications.

The greyish stripes on this thrust collar face indicate spark erosion
Above is a thrust collar face with clear signs of spark erosion. Spark erosion may not be visible on the entire surface. When inspecting the thrust collar surface or the main bearing journal, remember to slowly turn the engine 360˚ / 1 revolution, and inspect the entire surface very carefully.
In order to prevent and protect against spark erosion is to used a correctly installed and well maintained shaftline earthing device.
The shaftline earthing device is installed on the propeller shaft, close to the man engine and if shaft generator is installed , the device is installed forward of the generator, between generator and the engine flywheel.

Shaft earthing device parts
The shaftline earthing device consists of two silver slip rings, two arrangements for holding brushes including connecting cables and monitoring equipment with a mV-meter and an output signal for alarm. The shaftline earthing device should be able to keep the electrical potential difference below 50 mV DC, and there must be installed a shaft to hull monitoring equipment with a mV-meter and with an output signal to the alarm system so that the potential and thus the correct function of the shaftline earthing device can be monitored.
When the shaftline earthing device is working correctly, the electrical potential will normally be within the range of 10-50 mV DC. The alarm set-points should be 5 mV for low alarm and 80 mV for high alarm. The alarm signals with alarm delay of 30 seconds and alarm cut-off, when engine is stopped, must be connected to the alarm system.
As part of the system maintenance be particularly cautious with maintenance if the shaftline earthing device is located in the far aft end of the shaft or other exposed place. Always overhaul and replace worn parts in due time:
-
-
- Replace the slip ring before the silver layer is worn through.
- Replace worn out brushes.
- Keep the slip ring clean and dry.
-
Corrosion between the slip ring and the shaft can be difficult to detect and it is recommended these procedures:
-
-
- No monitoring voltmeter installed – Measure electrical contact between slip ring and shaft at least monthly to reveal any concealed corrosion. If resistance exceeds 5 mΩ, overhaul the slip ring.
- Monitoring voltmeter installed – Check shaftline earthing device monitoring monthly.
-
If you like my posts, please don’t forget to press Like and Share. You can also Subscribe to this blog and you will be informed every time when a new article is published. Also you can buy me a coffee by donating to this website, so I will have the fuel I need to keep producing great content! Thank you!
Source and Bibliography:
- MAN Diesel video training
- MAN Diesel & Turbo Service letter SL2008-498
Pingback: Chief Engineer Log